Reclaiming Our Freedom From Germ Theory
See also: Confessions of a Terrain Theorist
Given there is a lot of talk about freedoms in the conspiracy community at the moment, I want to start with this question: what is freedom without freedom from fear of disease? Or, more specifically: disease caused by germs?
You can be free in every physical aspect of life: work, money, sex, power, fame... whatever you desire. Yet, if you are still a slave, mentally and physically, to the constant threat of disease from external pathogens that are perpetually out to get you — the assumption that lies at the heart of the Germ Theory of disease — then do you really have freedom? Can you even begin to argue that you have freedom when your health still depends on institutions that it has been demonstrated have corruption and profit running through their veins?
In fact: while any of us choose to stay within this society — if we choose, at least for now, to resist the urge to start afresh in a commune in the hills surrounded by like-minded social dissidents — do any of us really have freedom at all? Regardless of our own personal health beliefs: do any of us truly hold such freedom while our society operates and increasingly disintegrates under this Germ Theory paradigm?
We need to start planning our escape from Germ Theory — to reclaim the health freedom that it has taken from us — but our only hope is to take those that we love and care for with us.
Why did I stop believing in Germ Theory? I’ll give you three reasons.
My doubts began with my own experiences with the Western Health/Disease Industry. I was diagnosed with a medical condition — Meniere’s Disease — that conventional healthcare was and continues to be unable to provide any theoretical or practical help for: an incredibly dispiriting yet also ultimately self-empowering experience that I know very well I am not alone in.
After forking out for a hearing test, a balance test, an MRI, and two triple-figure-costing consultations with an apparent specialist, I was told by this specialist that they could provide no explanation or remedy for my condition. After being very careful to warn me off attempting any radical ‘alternative’ modes of treatment, I was sent home with some useless pharmaceutical products and a casual suggestion to eat less salt… and asked come back for a third triple figure costing consultation in a few months time.
It was at this stage that it started to dawn on me: i’m not sure these guys really know what they are talking about, but they certainly seem to be making a lot of money regardless.
It wasn’t all bad, it should be said: the experience left me with a resolute skepticism of a health system that refuses to acknowledge its own failures, while at the same time shamelessly trumpeting (Orange Man-esque) its own alleged achievements — leaving me in good stead to make sense of the last 2 years of madness.
My doubts in the wisdom of our health system and its reliance on Germ Theory as an operating framework continued to grow, in close correlation with our reality becoming increasingly diverged from what I still see as a logical and self-evident principle: that medicine can never and should never be administered on a population-wide basis.
Apparently, suddenly, it was ok to administer an experimental injection outside of a hardware store a few metres to the left of a sausage sizzle. Welcome to the logical endpoint of Western Medicinal Science!
Such a mechanistic, simplistic and impersonal model for medicine seems completely at odds within an appreciation of the full complexity and diversity of humanity: whether it be differences by age, diet, genetics, or any other variable that would logically influence how a medicine might be tolerated and integrated into the body. Its almost obsessive focus on increasing the production of antibodies to the fear-inducing germ in question also seems almost criminally ignorant of the dangers of the epidemic of chronic autoimmunity we are experiencing — conditions resulting from prolonged and exaggerated antibody responses.
Anyone claiming to practice medicine while in complete disregard for these biological realities seemed either fatally (literally) flawed in their understanding of health, or is not driven by the motive of health.
And this is where it properly started to dawn on me: wow, these guys really don’t seem to know what they are talking about, and they could well be doing a great deal of harm as a result.
My doubts in Germ Theory itself were confirmed as I got deep into ‘alternative’ health research: when I realised that there was a coherent alternative paradigm for understanding human disease — Terrain Theory — that seemed more logical, hopeful and life-affirming then the one being enforced upon us as objective truth.
Yes, there are microbes that take the form of what we have been told are viruses, and yes these microbes are found in disproportionately high numbers in and around diseased cells. There are no disputes between the two theories here. Where the dispute lies is whether these microbes are there to cause disease, or are actually there as a result of — even to help provide remedy to — the disease caused by other, usually inorganic, toxic influences.
It suddenly dawned on me the possibility that we have been systematically misinformed about the causes of disease by institutions that have grown into self-enforcing systems of accumulating and holding power — held together via the demonisation of microscopic organisms that were in fact Designed to assist us.
And this was the most unpleasant realisation of all: sure, many people operating within this model of health don’t seem to know what they are talking about… but some of them surely do, and they are the ones profiting off our ignorance and disease.
That doesn’t mean everyone who believes in Germ Theory is in on the scam — of course not, because this is one of, if not the, most cunning psy-ops ever attempted on humanity. There is no shame in it.
It also doesn’t mean there aren’t microbes that cause disease, because that is still very possible under the terrain theory model. Being a terrain theorist doesn’t excuse you from hand washing after number 2s or from rinsing your lettuce. What it means is that we have fallen victim to an astonishingly effective campaign, stretching several centuries, to turn microbes that serve to remedy disease into the unwitting and undeserving cause of this disease.
In fact, such is my level of doubt, I can no longer look at Germ Theory as anything but an elaborate conspiracy — equal parts ingenious and shameless — to make us believe that there are and will always exist invisible biological agents that are actively seeking us out and intending to do us harm. Or, in more simple terms, that nature itself is perpetually out to get us, and should be feared.
Now, here is the challenging part.
You might already believe — or now believe, after seeing it laid out to you in this way — that the things that I am saying are true (or you might not, in which case fair play for sticking with me this long). But what good are these beliefs beyond our own personal well-being if kept to ourselves? What tangible change will happen if we can’t articulate these new and in many ways revolutionary beliefs so as to make our friends, family and community see them as well?
You might know the failings of our health system from personal experiences — these staggering and debilitating failures that make a mockery of the continued praise and worship bestowed upon the Western Medical model. But for those who haven’t experienced these failures, how would they know unless we explain it to them?
You might have an inherent belief in the complexity of medicine as well, and share the view that it is absolutely laughable and ridiculous to be administering an experimental medicine outside of a hardware store alongside a sausage sizzle. But again: if we can’t explain this complexity in a simple way, we aren’t going to be making much progress on those who are still lining up for their shots at whatever location happens to be most convenient.
You might also be coming around to the idea that these invisible microbes that we call viruses are more benevolent than malevolent. You might be starting to realise that the key quality that every political leader in the world right now shares is their willingness to exploit this alleged malevolence. But, in the end, it doesn’t matter whether Sleepy Joe in America, or Blackface Trudeau in Canada, or Dictator Dan in Victoria, or even Marky Mark here in Western Australia get replaced by someone with less tendency to weaponise Germ Theory for their own personal and political ends. We will still be stuck, as a society and community, in the same failing paradigms of health, medicine and disease.
It’s time to plan our collective escape from Germ Theory. And what better time than now: when its failings, its hubris, its dormant psychopathy and authoritarianism, are being laid bare for all to see.
Freedom awaits!
Watch more on my views on germ theory, terrain theory and what it means for our current predicament here: